The Stanford Prison Experiment

The Stanford Prison Experiment

Blu-ray Disc - 2016
Average Rating:
25
1
Rate this:
A group of male students are selected to take on randomly assigned roles in a mock prison located in the basement of Stanford University's psychology building.
Publisher: Orland Park, IL :, MPI Home Video,, [2016]
Call Number: BLU F STAN
Characteristics: video file,Blu-ray video,region A,rda
HDTV,rda
digital,optical,unknown,unknown,rda
1 videodisc (122 min.) : sound, color ; 4 3/4 in

Opinion

From the critics


Community Activity

Comment

Add a Comment

s
sbhojraj
Jun 19, 2017

The previous comment talked about it being worth only a 15 minutes docudrama. I disagree. If one is willing to be patient and see how while we all consider ourselves "good kind persons" lurking under our skin is a very deep possibility (please note I am not saying everybody has it but a large majority of us have it) to be corrupted by authority. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Really worth watching.

n
Nooksack20
Jun 15, 2017

This story was so slow and redundant that I could barely wade through it to the end. It should have been a 15 minute short docudrama.

s
sdiblasio
Feb 11, 2017

THE STANFORD EXPERIMENT (DVD)

at a coin toss, the decision was made between the abusers and the abused.

The Psychologist looked like a caricature of the cartoons that show good and evil thoughts of someone when the devil is speaking to them. I recalled the book, “Why Christians Can't Trust Psychologist”, by Ed Buckley, Phd. CCHR booklet, "Unholy Assault", is a good reference. Foremost, a lot of Psychology involves the absence of God because there are a lot of atheist in their group. Page 51 PII, “Psychology rarely deals with established facts or truths, but with subjective opinions and interpretations of uncontrollable objectives...tainted by the unique freewill of the subject and the mindset of the researchers.”

Researchers often admit that negative outcomes are not reported because it would have a negative effect on the continuation and funding. It is a known fact that researchers skew their reports to make it appear to be more of a success to appease the pocketbook. Ref. Research misconduct

Psychology was developed in the minds of men who were godless rebels. (Romans 1:22). They are of carnal minds (Romans 1:28). Psychologist attempts to replace Jesus as the Healer of Souls.

“Setting Ethical Standards to Medical Research Involving Human Subjects”, by Ralph Slovenko, mentioned on page 36PII of “Biomedical Ethics”, by Dawn Laney, “Issues were raised regarding universally accepted principles for carrying out human experimentation.”

Precedent case regarding Informed Consent in 1957-Salvo V. Leland Stanford, Jr., University Board of Trustees

Henry Beecher (Harvard Professor, published article at 22 objectionable research points), states that the relationship between investigator and patient/subject is one that can be easily manipulated.

“A Nineteenth Century Physician Develops a Modern Formal Code of Medical Ethics”, by Thomas Percival, mentions on page 42 paragraph II, “The use of 'quack medicines' should be discouraged by the faculty, as disgraceful to the profession, injurious to health, and often destructive even of life...PIII, No physician or surgeon should dispense a secret 'nostrum' [cure], whether it be his invention, or exclusive property. For; if it be of real efficacy, the concealment of it is in consistent with the beneficence and professional liberality. And if mystery alone give it value and importance, such craft implies either disgraceful ignorance, or fraudulent avarice.”

Franln Nov 07, 2016

One of those stories where you can't quite believe this is based on actual events. Very fascinating and disturbing.

v
valeeene
Oct 27, 2016

The film is based on one of the two most famous experiments in social psychology. There were no ethical guidelines at the time and this would never be allowed to be conducted today. The original study was filmed and is available on line. It is called Quiet Rage. That film is blurry and not that entertaining. I show this film in all Introductory and Social Psychology classes and then we discuss ethical principles. This version is more accessible and easier to watch. Anyone with an interest should go to the Stanford Prison Study website or to Learner.org to see Zimbardo's films on 19 areas of psychology. Actually, the real Zimbardo is much more charismatic than the person playing him in the film. As for it not being a true experiment as someone has said--wrong! Participants were randomly assigned to conditions. It is a study of de-individuation and is a landmark study in Psychology.

n
No_Stalkers4Me
Oct 03, 2016

Zimbardo has made, and continues to make, some great contributions (lectures online). I was shocked he let this simulation go as far as it did ... but I suppose that's part of the learning ... for all of us.

g
Greta1andlucy2
Aug 30, 2016

On the surface this appeared to be an intriguing film- even had nice cinematography. But when I started watching it, it was a joke. Wasn't a true experiment- no controlled or independent variables- just a professor ( who looked a lot like Charles Manson) who shabbily put together this "experiment" and let it go as a free for all. The actors were good for whatever roles they were given, but there was no character study or depth to the film. Anyone who sees this as a great film doesn't know great film.

a
Alyxwrites
Aug 10, 2016

"Overall, this movie packs a punch to the gut because it makes you want to know more about the experiment itself. Most have heard of it as it is touched on in most Psychology classes, but this film allows a theatrical look that a documentary cannot provide. The creative camerawork..."

To read more of this review, copy and paste the link below!

https://alyxwrites.wordpress.com/2016/08/10/stanford-prison-experiment-2015-review/

c
COURIER3
Jul 23, 2016

Watched 15-30 minutes of this boondoggle. Just could not get into it.

j
jaketaz777
Jul 20, 2016

Seems that the prof. found out his own tendencies by not stopping the so called experiment, all people have this same potential though and some need to an example before they will believe. What a shame

View All Comments

Age

Add Age Suitability

r
rem85
Jan 25, 2016

rem85 thinks this title is suitable for 13 years and over

Summary

Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.

Notices

Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.

Quotes

Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number

Recommendations

Subject Headings

  Loading...

Find it at SFPL

  Loading...
[]
[]
To Top